classic books everyone should read

To Kill a Mockingbird


100 classic books write their way into the DS’ history

“Ancient works are classical not because they are old, but because they are powerful, fresh, and healthy.” Perhaps classic books are also classic .

The ultimate list of classic books that have become MUST READs for all. How many have you read and do you think there is still a place for our younger readers for the Classics that are both wonderful stories but also complex and devoid or simple words!

Yay! You're now following classic books in your .

Yay! You're now following vintage classic books in your .

Publishing houses and colleges/universities are at times in the business of classic books. Publishers have their various types of ‘classic book’ lines, while universities and colleges have their ‘required reading lists’ (for more information, visit ). If these books are the works of literature that well-read people are supposed to have read or at least be familiar with, then the genesis of the classic book genre and the processes through which texts are considered for selection (or not) is of interest. The development of the Penguin Classic line of books, among the most well-known of the classic imprints, can serve as an example. The is often cited as another example.

Over the course of her essay, Clark considers the question of what makes a piece of literature a classic and why the idea of "the classics" is important to society as a whole. Clark says that "teachers of English have been so long trained in the 'classics' that these 'classics' have become to them very much like the Bible, for the safety of which the rise of modern science causes such unnecessary fears." She goes on to say that among the sources she consulted was a group of eighth-graders when she asked them the question: "What do you understand by the classics in literature?" Two of the answers Clark received were "Classics are books your fathers give you and you keep them to give to your children" and "Classics are those great pieces of literature considered worthy to be studied in English classes of high school or college". Calvino agrees with the Ohio educator when he states "Schools and universities ought to help us understand that no book that talks about a book says more than the book in question, but instead they do their level best to make us think the opposite." Clark and Calvino come to a similar conclusion that when a literary work is analyzed for what makes it 'classic', that in just the act of analysis or as Clark says "the anatomical dissection", the reader can end up destroying the unique pleasure that mere enjoyment a work of literature can hold.