Home

Defendant - Appellant: LITONIA VICTORIA MOSELEY

13-6039 - US v. Litonia Moseley

Too low to display


FDsys: GPO's Federal Digital System About FDsys

U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Friedman found that LiTonia Victoria Moseley is suffering from a mental disease or defect and is currently unable to understand the charges against her. Moseley tried to persuade the judge otherwise, but even her attorney recommended commitment.

LiTonia Victoria Moseley, who was released from prison on July 11, 2008, has re-established Web sites touting her many - unsubstantiated - accomplishments, including a claim that her business is worth $200 million.

US v. Litonia Moseley :: Justia Dockets & Filings

Litonia Moseley Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Friedman found that LiTonia Victoria Moseley is suffering from a mental disease or defect and is currently unable to understand the charges against her. Moseley tried to persuade the judge otherwise, but even her attorney recommended commitment.

LiTonia Victoria Moseley seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. , , 484 (2000); , , 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. , 529 U.S. at 484-85.